“Joseph Plazo on the Dangers of Algorithmic Obedience: Who Controls the Machine?”
“Joseph Plazo on the Dangers of Algorithmic Obedience: Who Controls the Machine?”
Blog Article
At a regional summit of young minds trained in data and dollars, Joseph Plazo—founder of the algorithmic trading firm Plazo Sullivan Roche—offered an unusual message: slow down.
From Manila, where financial optimism runs high — Plazo didn’t talk about speed or scale.
“The machine may be faster. But are we still the ones deciding what matters?”
???? **The Man Behind the Model—Now Questioning Its Impact**
He’s not critiquing technology from a safe distance. His firm’s AI systems have posted a 99% win rate across key timeframes and are in use by institutional clients across Europe and Asia.
Still, he asks: what happens when efficiency erases human context?
“Speed is seductive. But context is critical.”
He shared a case from the early days of the pandemic. One of his firm’s bots flagged a short on gold just before the U.S. Federal Reserve issued an emergency policy shift.
“We overrode it. It was a machine doing math, not reading history.”
???? **Machines Act Fast. But Leadership Sometimes Waits.**
AI’s appeal lies in its instant execution. But at what cost?
“We must remember that a moment of hesitation can protect reputations—and futures.”
Plazo introduced a framework he calls **“Conviction Calculus”**—three questions that must be asked before executing an AI recommendation:
- Who takes responsibility if the code is flawless—but the outcome disastrous?
- Is there non-digital confirmation? What do experience, memory, and culture say?
- Does leadership end when the model takes website over?
???? **As Fintech Booms, Where Are the Ethical Guardrails?**
Across Asia, nations are investing heavily in fintech and AI-driven innovation. From Singapore to South Korea, the push toward automation is framed as economic strategy.
But Plazo’s question cuts deeper: “AI is moving capital—but is it moving it in the right direction?”
He warned of systems designed to win—but not to pause.
“These weren’t errors of greed or emotion. They were perfectly logical moves—executed without context.”
???? **The Alternative: Narrative AI That Considers More Than Numbers**
Plazo is not anti-AI. He’s pro-responsibility.
His firm is developing what he calls **“narrative-integrated AI”**—models that factor in geopolitics, tone, and social context alongside market data.
“The future isn’t faster bots—it’s smarter, humbler ones.”
That idea is already drawing attention.
One investor called Plazo’s talk:
“A blueprint for ethical AI in an unequal world.”
???? **The Final Warning: Crashes Don’t Always Start Loudly**
Plazo ended with a thought that may echo across boardrooms:
“Emotion won’t trigger the fall. Certainty will.”
It wasn’t fearmongering. It was foresight.
Because when machines take over the trades, leadership cannot go offline.